Recent posts
Tuesday, 16 March 2010 Navigation: Home
Please donate for the campaign

Enter Amount:

Main Menu
Home
Booklet on Sonia Gandhi
About Gandhi
Truth about Sonia Gandhi
What did Sonia say about Gandhi?
Press Releases
Press Coverage
Rebuttals and Responses
Discuss & Comment
Documents and Proof
100 million lawsuit
Guestbook
Contact Us
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Syndicate
 
Withdrawal of NY Lawsuit and Dismissial of NJ Lawsuit
 

PRESS RELEASE - $100 MILLION LIBEL LAWSUIT - Truth Prevails

 

Indian National Overseas Congress Withdraws $100 Million Libel Law Suit filed against Kataria et al, aimed at exposing truth about Sonia Gandhi.

 

(Click here for New York Times Advertisement)

 

Finally the truth has prevailed.

 

In a bizarre turn of events, Karasik & Associates, attorneys for Indian National Overseas Congress, a subsidiary of Indian National Congress, headed by Sonia Gandhi, in INOC v. Kataria, et al. served a Notice of Discontinuance in the above-named action to Justice Emly Jane Goodman of the Supreme Court of New York on September 29, 2008. The Notice of Discontinuane tantamounts to an unconditional surrender by the Congress Party and could be construed as a victory of Dharmic forces.  In actuality, the hearing in this case, originally, was scheduled to be held October 2,  2008.

 

The prominent Law Firm of Kornstein, Veisz, Wexler & Pollard represented Narain Kataria, Arish Sahani and Indo Caribbean Council. The stipulation between the attorneys of the two parties was agreed to, signed and stamped in the Court on October 2, 2008.  Prior to this last month a similar case filed by INOC in New Jersey Court against Sunanda Thali, Satyanarayana Dosapati, Naresh Sharma, and Mahatma Gandhi International Foundation, Inc., was summarily dismissed by the Judge who found that the Plaintiff had no locus standi in filing such a frivolous case.

 

It is a matter of great happiness for all NRIs, particularly Hindus,  that the famous adage from Vedic literature Satya Mev Jayate (Truth shall always prevail, once again, prevailed in New York and New Jersey Courts, on the Birthday of Mahatma Gandhi!

 

In this connection, it should be noted that the INOC had filed these two lawsuits on the alleged grounds that Kataria, Sahani et al had defamed President of Indian National Congress, Sonia Gandhi, by bringing out a full page advertisements in The New York Times, dated October 6, 2007.  Some extracts from that advertisement are as follows:

 

“UN’s declaration of Mahatma Gandhi’s birthday on October 2nd as the International Non-Violence Day is commendable.  However, instead of a true Gandhian delivering his message of peace and non-violence, Sonia Gandhi who is not a representative of Gandhian values is chosen.

 

“Sonia Maino Gandhi is NOT related to Mahatma Gandhi.  She is attempting to misappropriate his name for political mileage and international legitimacy.

 

“Sonia is known to be vindictive and undemocratic.  Her party uses various mechanisms, such as tax raids, direct threats to subjugate opposition. (“Know your Sonia” by Dr. Subramanian Swamy, visiting Harvard Professor)

 

“Due to her party’s pro-terrorist policies, India has second highest  number of terrorism victims after Iraq.  Her Government is requesting clemency to Afzal Guru, the mastermind of attack on Indian Parliament.  In pursuit of Muslim vote bank, she has created soft borders and turned a blind eye towards Islamic fundamentalism.

 

“Her husband Rajiv Gandhi is alleged to have received payments from KGB.  According to Schweizer, Illustrierte, Rajiv has a secret Swiss Bank account of 2 billion dollars.  Her son Rahul projected as next Prime Minister of India, was detained by FBI with large unaccounted cash at Boston Airport in 2001.  (Swiss magazine  Schweizer, Illustrierte 11/1991, Indo Asian News Service).

 

“Her party was involved in the UN Oil for Food Scam that helped Saddam Hussain.  She was involved in numerous scams, scandals and controversies.  Before entering India, she was an au-pair with modest means.  Since then, she and her family members have amassed millions through questionable means.  (Know Your Sonia by India First Foundation) 

 

The purpose of these cases, it is believed, was to silence the voice of the critics of Sonia Gandhi through her surrogates, stifle the voice of freedom, make defendants financially bankrupt, frighten them into submission, and suppress the truth.

 

It is also worthwhile to mention here that these two cases had generated an inquisitive interest in media, a sense of unity and brotherhood among Indian Diaspora, particularly Hindus and Sikhs, who had organized fund raisers and established Hindu Support Fund to defray  attorneys’ fees and other related expenses to be incurred in these cases.

 

It is a matter of great satisfaction and joy that the Right of Free Speech guaranteed under the First Amendment of American Constitution has been upheld by the judges and the sinister designs of enemies of freedom of speech, actuated by the malicious desire to muzzle the voice of free speech, truth, and vilify the defendants,  have been nipped in the bud.

 

For further information, please visit:  www.HinduSupportFund.com.

 

 

Narain Kataria

President

Indian American Intellectuals Forum

41-67 Judge Street (5P)
New York, NY 11373

(718) 478-5735

 
Protest on Oct 1, 2 - Press coverage, photos and videos

The following links contain press releases, photos and videos of the event. 

Click here for media coverage of the protest event. 

Click here for the forum's  Rebuttals and Responses to  various news items

Click here for TV Asia's coverage of the protest even

Press Release - Post Event

The Forum for Gandhi Heritage Organization and other likeminded associations held a peaceful protest rally outside the United Nations headquarters on October 2. About 500 people from around the US joined the protest objecting to the UN invitation to the Indian Congress President Sonia Gandhi. Read more .

Click here read/download PDF version

 Videos  Click here to watch all the videos
Photos
 

WATCH VIDEOS
(Google! video)

DOWNLOAD VIDEOS
(click here for download Instructions)
(Average , High quality)

Professional Video 1 - protest UN Watch on Google! video (2.4 min)

Average quality (mpeg, 23 MB)     

High quality (Quicktime, 163MB)

Professional Video 2 - protest UN Watch on Google! video (2.5 min)

Average quality (mpeg, 25 MB)      

High quality (Quicktime, 180 MB)

Video 1 - Protest in front of UN Watch on Google! video (1.5 min) Average quality (mpeg, 12.6 MB)
Video 2 - Protest in front of UN Watch on Google! video (2 min) Average quality (mpeg, 20 MB)
Video 3 - Protest in front of UN Watch on Google!video (1.5 min) Average quality (mpeg, 14 MB)
Video 4 - Overview of the protest in fron of UN Watch on Google!video (2.1 min) Average quality (mp4, 6.5 MB)
Video - Press Conference - The spokesperson explains Watch on Google!video (5.6 min)

Average quality (mpeg, 57 MB)

Low quality (mp4, 12.8 MB)

Rebuttal to Mr. Arun Gandhi letter in Rediff.com
Forum for Preserving Gandhi Heritage considers it unfortunate that Mr. Arun Gandhi, the grandson of Mahatma Gandhi characterized the protest against Ms. Sonia Gandhi representation of Mahatma Gandhi at UN as "unwarranted and senseless attack against Sonia Gandhi. His remarks lacked substance and of low taste. It is surprising that such remarks could come from someone who claims to be a direct descendant of Mahatma Gandhi. However, Forum would like to note that other extended members of Mahatma Gandhi family have provided extensive support for the protest.
Read more...

Rebuttal to Surinder Malhotra's letter to NYTimes
Dear Editor:

We received a copy of the letter sent to you by the Indian National Overseas Congress President Surinder Malhotra dated Oct 10, 2007 in response to the Ad placed in New York Times by Forum for Preserving Gandhi Heritage on Oct 6, 2007 (page 11). We were surprised at the tone and the accusations Mr. Malhotra made in his letter which lacked any meaningful content. In his obsession to protect his leader he seems to have lost rationale in his accusations of the organizers without any proof and his questioning of the integrity of an esteemed paper like New York Times. Forums Advertisement passed through both Acceptability and Legal Departments of New York Times based on the detailed proofs and documents provided by the Forum for each point mentioned in the Ad.
Read more...

 
Polls
Is Sonia Gandhi qualified to represent Mahatma Gandhi?
 
Who's Online
 
© 2010